Tuesday, July 28, 2026

Horner ‘appalled’ by Red Bull ‘cheat’ accusations ‘We’ve had zero benefit’

-

Red Bull boss Christian Horner says employees’ children have been bullied as a result of Zak Brown’s “cheating” letter; Horner wants FIA agreement as soon as possible after cost cap breach, and insists team are innocent and had “zero benefit” from accused overspend

By Matt Morlidge in Austin

Last Updated: 22/10/22 7:36pm

Red Bull boss Christian Horner has slammed McLaren’s Zak Brown for making “shocking” accusations of cheating, claiming there has been “weeks of effective abuse” for a Formula 1 cost cap breach the team still contest and have had “zero benefit” from.

In an emotionally-charged press conference at the United Sates GP – Horner’s first media briefing since Red Bull were accused of a ‘minor’ breach of F1’s $145m spending limit during Max Verstappen’s title-winning season – there was no confirmation of a punishment or details of “productive” talks with the FIA, but Horner passionately defended his team.

The Red Bull team principal, sitting alongside Brown, took particular offence to the McLaren CEO’s letter to the FIA last week, seen by Sky Sports, in which he said breaching the cost cap “constitutes cheating”.

Horner claimed employees’ children were being bullied as a result of the allegations.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Christian Horner says the overspend had ‘zero effect on our car performance’ and is disappointed at the accusations from competitors for their own competitive gain.

Christian Horner says the overspend had ‘zero effect on our car performance’ and is disappointed at the accusations from competitors for their own competitive gain.

“It’s tremendously disappointing,” said Horner. “It’s absolutely shocking that another competitor, without the facts, without the details can be making that kind of accusation.

“We’ve been on trial because of public opinion since Singapore [when reports of Red Bull breach emerged]. The rhetoric of cheats, that we’ve had this enormous benefit, and numbers have been put out by the media that are miles out of reality.

“The damage that does to the brand, to our partners, to our drivers, to our workforce… in an age when mental health is prevalent we’re seeing significant issues within our workforce. We’re seeing kids that are being bullied in playgrounds, employees’ children.

“You cannot go around just making that kind of allegation from any fact or substance. We absolutely are appalled at the behaviour of some of our competitors.”

Horner added to Sky Sports F1: “We should be talking about Verstappen [who has won last two titles].

“Not one question has been about Max’s performance, and I think it’s in the interests of everybody. What’s particularly disappointing is the reaction by some of our competitors, that are making massive accusations that have zero substance to them, and trying to leverage and pressure the FIA for their own competitive gain. “

In response, Brown defended his letter, which didn’t mention Red Bull by name but was sent soon after their breach was revealed.

“My letter set out that if a team spent more than the cap, they’re going to gain an advantage,” he said. “We’re not taking a view if they did or didn’t. My letter was if someone has, these are the things that should be addressed.

“I didn’t mention any team, it was a general response now that we are into the cost cap era, here’s what we think the ramifications are.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Christian Horner denies that Red Bull have gained any advantage from any cost cap breach and believes the relevant costs are within the cap.

Christian Horner denies that Red Bull have gained any advantage from any cost cap breach and believes the relevant costs are within the cap.

Horner, however, claimed that Brown had a “very convenient memory of the letter that he wrote”.

“We’ve been tried and subjected to three weeks of effective abuse,” he insisted. “It’s just not right. This has to stop.”

Horner also batted back claims that Red Bull could have had a benefit from overspending, which Sky Sports understands the FIA have down as around $1.8m. It is also believed that Red Bull’s initial submission was $4.5m under the cap, but unexpected extra costs – such as unused spare parts for their car – put them over.

“You’ve got to look at the relevant costs [within the cap] what’s in the costs and what is out,” Horner said. “Our view is that our relevant costs are within the costs.

“We are in discussions with the FIA about what the costs are and what are mitigating potential circumstances.

“We had zero benefit from a development perspective or operational perspective either from 2021 or 2022 from the way we operated within the cap. Our submission was significantly below the cap.

“We absolutely and categorically don’t feel we’ve had any advantage either in 2021 or 22 or 23, 24. Some teams are even talking about 2026. It’s totally fictitious.”

Red Bull want verdict ASAP